Book Review – The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration 10 Years Later

The New Jim Crow by Michelle Alexander

The New Jim Crow by Michelle Alexander

Photo Credit: The New Jim Crow, The New Press

In the ten years since the seminal work on race in America in the 21st century – Michelle Alexander’s The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness – was published, how has our country’s criminal justice system evolved? How does it rate when analyzed for treatment of minorities, persons of low income, and the formerly incarcerated? What are some ways in which both the prison and criminal justice systems could be revamped today?

The New Jim Crow provides an abundance of statistics on incarceration rates for persons of color. Painstakingly researched, the book paints a chilling look at the dramatic disparities in rates of prison sentences for persons of color versus whites, particularly when considering rates of drug crime by all people. (1)

In addition, Alexander describes the social impact of our country’s emphasis on using prisons as a form of deterrence and the primary system of punishment for persons who violate the nation’s laws. It also demonstrate how ineffective our nation it is at accomplishing both goals.

One would think that in ten years dramatic changes would have been made to the prison and criminal justice systems in the U.S., but statistically there has been little change. According to The Prison Policy Institute’s 2019 annual report, the U.S. still leads the world in incarceration rates with over 2.3 million people in jail and prison around the country. There are also another 4.5 million people on probation and parole, making the number of persons under some form of supervision in the U.S. nearly 7 million people.

Interestingly, crime rates nationally have decreased during the same time period – and in some areas of the country -significantly. According to the Pew Research Center, crime rates have been on the decline for the past quarter century. Pew goes on to note that public perceptions, driven by media and politicians, are not in alignment with the facts. For example, over 40% of Americans surveyed in ’18 by the Gallup Poll thought there was more crime in their neighborhoods than the year before.

With respect to race, people of color are still incarcerated at vastly higher rates than whites. Black Americans make up only about 13% of the nation’s population, yet they still constitute over 40% of the prison and jail population in the U.S. according to the PPI. Our criminal justice system punishes the poor, so it is no surprise that Black Americans are still over-represented in jail and prison as the poverty rate for Blacks (20.8%) is double that of Whites (10.1%).

So what are some of the forces behind our continued national pathology to lock up people rather than looking for other healthy and productive ways to deal with transgression and modify behavior?

  1. District Attorneys – Often driven by career objectives rather than justice, DA’s regularly prosecute cases in order to show that they are ‘tough on crime’ and are able to achieve convictions at higher rates than their peers.
  2. Bail – Even the median felony bail amount of $10,000 is prohibitively expensive for typical defendants as their incomes hover around the U.S. poverty rate of $16,247. As a result, tens of thousands of poor people end up being detained because they cannot afford bail.
  3. Technical Arrests – One of the significant driving factors for high recidivism rates (the return of prisoners to jail/prison) is due to ‘technical violations’ as opposed to new crimes. These are violations of parole or probation and rather than leading to a hearing, generally the individual is arrested, fined with bail (depending on the technicality) and then incarcerated if they aren’t able to pay the bail or if the violation is classified as non-bail available.
  4. Privatization – While the use of private prisons and jails is only about 8% of the total incarcerated population, private corporations still reap billions of dollars each year from the prison system. These companies provide food services, health care, telephone calls, commissary supplies and other services, often at excessively high rates, which the families end up having to pay.

Michelle Alexander recently posted an article titled ‘Ten year later everything has changed and nothing has changed – Part I’ in the Minnesota Spokesman-Reporter about the current state of our criminal justice system and race in America. In it she recognizes that during the Obama presidency some progress was made. However, much of those accomplishments have been destroyed by the Trump administration.

How we evolve from here will depend on how well we reform our bail system and conditions of parole/probation violations, diminish the influence of for-profit companies in prisons and train district attorneys and prosecutors to seek fair and equitable verdicts rather than racking up convictions. For Alexander, the connective tissue around these issues is race. Until the U.S. truly faces its history of racial oppression and bigotry, it will be impossible to provide ‘justice for all’.


  • “Studies show that people of all colors use and sell illegal drugs at remarkably similar rates. If there are significant differences in the surveys to be found, they frequently suggest that whites, particularly white youth, are more likely to engage in drug crime than people of color. That is not what one would guess, however, when entering our nation’s prisons and jails… In some states black men have been admitted to prison on drug charges at rates twenty to fifty times greater than those of white men.”  (TNJC, by MA page 7)
  • “The stark and sobering reality is that, for reasons largely unrelated to actual crime trends, the American penal system has emerged as a system of social control unparalleled in world history. While the size of the system alone might suggest that it would touch the lives of most Americans, the primary targets of its control can be defined largely by race. This is an astonishing development, especially given that… prison did not deter crime significantly, many experts concluded.”
  • “Contrary to what many people would have us believe, what our nation is experiencing is not new. The politics of ‘Trumpism’ and ‘fake news’ are not new; they are as old as the nation itself. The very same playbook has been used over and over in this country by those who seek to preserve racial hierarchy, or to exploit racial resentments and anxieties for political gain, each time with similar results.” ‘Ten years later everything has changed and nothing has changed – Part 1’, by MA